🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.